Newsletter Subscribe
Enter your email address below and subscribe to our newsletter
Enter your email address below and subscribe to our newsletter
A clear guide explaining Jury Nullification, its history, and its impact on the justice system.
Jury Nullification occurs when a jury returns a verdict of not guilty despite believing that the defendant has technically violated the law.
Definition
Jury Nullification is the act of a jury deliberately choosing to acquit a defendant because the jurors believe the law itself is unjust, improperly applied, or that a conviction would result in an unfair outcome.
Jury Nullification arises from the jury’s power to deliver a verdict without being required to explain its reasoning. While juries are instructed to apply the law as given by the judge, they cannot be punished for acquitting a defendant.
Historically, Jury Nullification has been used in cases involving moral opposition to certain laws, such as laws related to slavery, prohibition, or civil rights. Supporters view it as a safeguard against unjust laws, while critics argue it undermines the rule of law.
Most courts do not inform juries about nullification and may actively discourage it during trials.
There is no formula, but Jury Nullification typically involves:
A jury acquits a defendant charged under a law perceived as discriminatory, despite clear evidence of a technical violation—an instance of Jury Nullification.
Jury Nullification matters for business and economics because it:
Businesses involved in jury trials must consider the potential influence of public sentiment on verdicts.
Jurors cannot be punished for verdicts, but courts discourage the practice.
Generally no; juries are instructed to follow the law.
Yes, though it is rare and unofficial.