Newsletter Subscribe
Enter your email address below and subscribe to our newsletter
Enter your email address below and subscribe to our newsletter
A comprehensive guide explaining Judicial Review, its purpose, processes, and role in democratic systems.
Judicial Review is the process by which courts examine and determine the legality or constitutionality of actions taken by the government, public institutions, or lower courts.
Definition
Judicial Review is a legal mechanism that allows courts to invalidate laws, policies, or decisions that violate a constitution or exceed delegated authority.
Judicial Review is a cornerstone of constitutional law and democratic governance. It empowers the judiciary to interpret the constitution and maintain a balance between branches of government.
The concept originated in the early 19th century, with the landmark U.S. Supreme Court case Marbury v. Madison (1803), which established the judiciary’s authority to review legislative and executive actions.
Today, Judicial Review exists in many forms across democracies. Some countries have strong constitutional courts dedicated to this function, while others integrate review authority into regular court systems.
Judicial Review may address:
There is no formula, but the typical Judicial Review process involves:
In 2017, the UK Supreme Court conducted Judicial Review on Brexit procedures, ruling that Parliament—not the executive—must authorize the triggering of Article 50. This affirmed parliamentary sovereignty.
Judicial Review impacts businesses by:
Businesses often rely on Judicial Review to challenge unfair taxation, licensing decisions, or regulatory penalties.
Yes. Courts may invalidate laws that contradict the constitution.
Individuals, organizations, or businesses affected by a government decision.
Most democracies have some form of Judicial Review, though structures vary.