Newsletter Subscribe
Enter your email address below and subscribe to our newsletter
Enter your email address below and subscribe to our newsletter
A clear guide explaining hostile takeovers, their mechanics, defenses, and real-world examples.
A hostile takeover is a corporate acquisition attempt made directly to a company’s shareholders or through the open market, without the approval or support of the target company’s management or board of directors.
Definition
A hostile takeover is an acquisition strategy where the acquiring firm bypasses the target’s management to gain control of the company.
In a hostile takeover, the acquiring company seeks control despite resistance from the target’s management. This is typically done by making a tender offer directly to shareholders at a premium price or by launching a proxy fight to replace the board.
Target companies may respond with defensive strategies such as poison pills, white knights, or staggered boards to deter the takeover. Hostile takeovers are more common in publicly traded companies where shares are widely held.
While controversial, hostile takeovers can sometimes unlock shareholder value by replacing underperforming management or restructuring inefficient operations.
In 2010, Kraft Foods launched a hostile takeover bid for Cadbury after Cadbury’s board initially rejected the offer. Kraft ultimately succeeded after increasing its bid, completing one of the most notable hostile takeovers in recent history.
Hostile takeovers matter because they:
Yes, as long as securities laws and regulations are followed.
Because they may threaten management control, company culture, or long-term strategy.
Often yes in the short term, due to takeover premiums.