What is Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac? Understanding the Pillars of the U.S. Housing Finance System

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

In 2021, Fannie Mae (Federal National Mortgage Association) and Freddie Mac collectively back nearly 70%of U.S. residential mortgages, underscoring their pivotal role in shaping the housing market and influencing mortgage financing nationwide.

Both entities were created and have been supported by the federal government to stabilize and expand the secondary mortgage market, especially during periods of economic stress.

But what does this mean for you as a business leader, investor, or innovator navigating the financial landscape? How do these government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) operate, and what implications do they hold for market stability, credit availability, and economic resilience?

By examining their history, function, and regulatory environment, you can better understand the forces that underpin mortgage lending and housing affordability in America today.

What are Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac?

Fannie Mae

The Federal National Mortgage Association, commonly known as Fannie Mae, is a government-sponsored enterprise (GSE) created in 1938 to provide liquidity in the mortgage market. It was established as part of the New Deal to expand the secondary mortgage market by securitizing mortgage loans.

The organization purchases mortgage loans from banks, which frees up cash for lenders to offer more home loans. While initially a GSE, it was converted to a publicly traded company in 1968, though it remains under government conservatorship.

Freddie Mac

The Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, known as Freddie Mac, is a government-sponsored enterprise established in 1970 to expand the secondary mortgage market. It buys mortgages primarily from smaller banks, credit unions, and thrifts, helping these lenders replenish funds to issue additional loans.

Like Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac is publicly traded but operates under government conservatorship to ensure market stability and protect taxpayers.

Government-Sponsored Enterprises in Mortgage Finance

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are government-sponsored enterprises that purchase mortgage loans from lenders, securitize them into mortgage-backed securities (MBS), and provide liquidity and stability to the secondary mortgage market, which is part of the broader secondary markets for mortgage assets.

Their core activities involve purchasing mortgages (specifically loans that meet the conforming loan limit) and securitizing these mortgages. Importantly, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac do not originate mortgages directly to borrowers. They only buy mortgages that conform to their established criteria, which include loan size and borrower credit score.

Role as Intermediaries Between Lenders and Investors

At their core, these entities serve as critical intermediaries between mortgage originators and investors, enabling lenders to replenish capital and continue issuing home loans.

Fannie Mae, for example, is a private company and a shareholder owned company with government sponsorship, and both GSEs have private shareholders and private investors participating in their ownership and investment.

Risk Reduction and Loan Guarantees

Their involvement reduces risk for private lenders and investors by providing loan guarantees, including the timely payment of principal and interest to investors in the MBS market. This guarantee is supported by an implicit government guarantee, which enhances its credit rating and lowers its borrowing costs.

Importance in Mortgage Credit Flow and Market Stability

Understanding their mechanisms is essential for grasping how mortgage credit flows, how economic policies influence housing markets, and how the secondary markets and mbs market function.

The Historical Context and Evolution

Establishment of Fannie Mae

Fannie Mae was established in 1938 amid the Great Depression to stimulate homeownership by creating a secondary market for Federal Housing Administration (FHA)-insured loans. Its full name is the Federal National Mortgage Association. Initially, it bought, held, and sold only FHA-insured loans but began investing in Veterans Administration (VA) loans in 1948.

Initially a government agency, it transitioned in 1968 into a mixed-ownership corporation, blending private capital with government support.

Creation and Role of Freddie Mac

Freddie Mac followed in 1970, created by Congress through the Emergency Home Finance Act to expand secondary market access. The Freddie Mac play focused on purchasing mortgages from smaller banks and thrifts; this is how Freddie Mac buys loans, in contrast to Fannie Mae’s focus on larger commercial banks, thus broadening the lender base.

Both entities benefited from exemptions from state and local taxes, including local taxes, which provided significant financial advantages. Responses to repeated housing crises and the resulting financial losses shaped Fannie Mae’s evolution and Freddie Mac’s market strategy.

Expansion of Mortgage Purchases and Regulatory Milestones

Both GSEs have evolved from buying primarily government-insured loans to purchasing a wide range of conforming mortgages, defined by criteria such as loan size and borrower creditworthiness. Key legislative milestones such as the Soundness Act, Enforcement Act, and Financial Institutions Reform have established oversight and regulatory frameworks to ensure their stability.

The 2008 Housing Crisis and Government Intervention

The 2008 housing crisis, driven in part by loan originators’ activities and the loosening of underwriting standards, led to significant financial losses and government intervention. The Economic Recovery Act established new regulatory structures and placed both entities into conservatorship, with dividend payments to the Treasury as part of the financial recovery strategy.

Fannie Mae’s and Freddie Mac’s missions have increasingly focused on supporting affordable housing for low-income families through targeted programs and guarantees, furthering equitable access to homeownership.

Operational Mechanics in the Secondary Mortgage Market

Mortgage Purchases from Private Lenders

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac do not originate loans themselves; instead, they buy loans (specifically, conforming mortgage loans) from private lenders such as commercial banks, credit unions, and mortgage originators. They then pool these loans into mortgage-backed securities (MBS) for sale to investors.

By engaging in mortgage purchases in the secondary mortgage market, which is part of the broader secondary markets for mortgage assets, they inject liquidity into the mortgage lending ecosystem, allowing lenders to issue new home loans without tying up capital.

Securitization into Mortgage-Backed Securities

Once acquired, these mortgage loans are pooled and securitized into mortgage-backed securities (MBS), which are sold to private investors, pension funds, insurance companies, and other participants in the mbs market. The pricing and risk of these securities are influenced by interest rate fluctuations.

Loan Guarantees and Credit Risk Transfer

The GSEs guarantee the timely payment of principal and interest payments on these securities, providing loan guarantees for investors. This guarantee transfers credit risk (including the risk of borrower defaults) from investors to themselves while charging guaranty fees for this service. These guarantees make the MBS attractive to borrowers and investors alike.

This structure enhances investor confidence, lowers borrowing costs, and promotes market stability.

Regulatory Oversight and Government Support

Primary Regulatory Agencies

The Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) serves as the primary regulator, overseeing the safety and soundness of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Alongside the FHFA, the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO) historically played a key role in regulatory supervision.

This includes enforcing capital requirements, underwriting standards, and mission goals focused on affordable housing.

Federal Government Financial Support

The federal government, through agencies like the FHFA and the Treasury Department, provides direct and indirect financial support to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, especially during periods of economic stress. The FHFA has the authority to conduct safety and soundness examinations of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and enforce necessary changes.

The Congressional Budget Office regularly analyzes and reports on the extent of this government support, including the costs and risks associated with loan guarantees and the implicit guarantee that the market perceives.

Implicit Government Guarantee and Market Impact

This implicit guarantee, while not legally binding, leads investors to assume that the federal government would intervene in times of distress, thereby lowering borrowing costs and increasing market stability for the GSEs.

Conservatorship and Post-Crisis Reforms

In response to the 2008 financial crisis, both entities were placed under conservatorship by the FHFA to mitigate systemic risks and restore market confidence, with the Treasury Department providing substantial financial support.

Since then, regulatory reforms have aimed to strengthen capital reserves, reduce credit risk exposure, and enhance transparency. These measures, including ongoing loan guarantee programs and federal agency oversight, are critical for protecting taxpayers and ensuring the continued viability of the housing finance system.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac: A Partnership

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, as government-sponsored enterprises, form a powerful partnership at the heart of the U.S. secondary mortgage market. Working in tandem, both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac provide essential liquidity to the mortgage market by purchasing loans from private lenders and transforming them into mortgage-backed securities.

This collaborative approach ensures that financial institutions can continue to offer home loans, supporting a steady flow of mortgage credit even during periods of economic uncertainty.

The Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) plays a central role in overseeing this partnership, setting standards that promote the safety and soundness of both GSEs while advancing their mission to foster affordable housing. By regulating Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the FHFA helps maintain market participants’ confidence and ensures that the benefits of the secondary mortgage market (such as lower interest rates and broader access to mortgage financing) are passed on to borrowers.

Together, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac’s coordinated efforts have enabled millions of Americans to achieve homeownership, particularly low- and moderate-income families. Their partnership not only stabilizes the housing finance system but also drives innovation and resilience across mortgage markets, reinforcing their status as pillars of the nation’s housing market.

Impact on Mortgage Markets and Economic Recovery

By providing liquidity and mitigating credit risk, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac directly influence mortgage interest rates, lending standards, and the availability of home loans. Their activities help smooth credit cycles, supporting homebuyers during economic downturns such as the housing crisis, and fostering recovery.

In response to these crises, the GSEs have played a key role in mitigating financial losses through regulatory measures and government interventions. As part of financial recovery strategies, dividend payments to the Treasury have also been implemented. Post-crisis reforms, including the Housing and Economic Recovery Act, established new regulatory frameworks to strengthen oversight and stability.

For example, during the COVID-19 pandemic, the GSEs implemented lenient lending standards and forbearance programs to maintain mortgage availability and prevent widespread foreclosures, providing critical protections for mortgage borrowers. Their ability to adapt quickly to economic shocks underscores their importance as stabilizing forces in financial markets.

Differences Between Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac

While both serve similar functions, their primary distinctions lie in the types of lenders they serve and operational nuances:

• Mortgage Sourcing: Fannie Mae primarily purchases loans from larger commercial banks, whereas Freddie Mac buys mortgages from smaller banks, credit unions, and thrifts. This approach is often referred to as the “Freddie Mac play,” highlighting its market strategy of supporting community and regional lenders.
• Loan Programs and Guidelines: Each has unique underwriting criteria and loan offerings, which can occasionally result in different approval outcomes for borrowers.

Understanding these differences can help mortgage originators and investors tailor strategies to optimize loan portfolio composition and risk management. Loan originators play a key role in sourcing loans for both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, influencing the types of mortgages that enter the secondary market.

Looking Ahead: The Future of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac

The future of these GSEs remains a subject of ongoing legislative and regulatory debate. Potential areas of future change include financial institutions reform, which could reshape the regulatory framework for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

Privatization proposals often focus on increasing the role of private shareholders and private investors, who currently hold common stock and influence the direction of these enterprises. The future of government support, particularly through loan guarantees, is also under discussion, as policymakers weigh the impact on federal budget accounting and market stability.

The Congressional Budget Office provides key analysis and estimates regarding these reforms, highlighting the implications for taxpayers and the broader financial system.

As a stakeholder in financial markets or housing finance, staying informed about these developments is crucial. The balance between public support and private sector participation will shape mortgage financing, housing affordability, and economic resilience in the years to come. Congress continues to debate the future of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, with some supporting privatization while others are concerned about the implications for the housing market.

Conclusion: Navigating the Complex Landscape of U.S. Housing Finance

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac stand as central pillars in the U.S. housing finance system, blending government sponsorship with private market participation to provide critical liquidity and stability to the secondary mortgage market. Their evolution, from their origins during the Great Depression and subsequent expansions, through the 2008 financial crisis and ongoing conservatorship, reflects the complex interplay between public policy, financial markets, and housing affordability.

Understanding their operational mechanics, regulatory oversight by agencies such as the Federal Housing Finance Agency, and their role in supporting affordable housing initiatives is essential for stakeholders across finance, real estate, and policy. These GSEs facilitate the flow of mortgage credit by purchasing conforming loans from a diverse range of lenders, securitizing them into mortgage-backed securities, and guaranteeing timely payments to investors, all while managing credit risk and market liquidity.

Looking forward, the future of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac remains subject to legislative and regulatory developments aimed at balancing market innovation, risk management, and the mission to expand access to affordable mortgage credit. Whether through reforms, potential privatization, or continued conservatorship, their influence on mortgage rates, housing market stability, and economic resilience will persist. The FHFA has required Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to increase their capital reserves to prepare for their exit from conservatorship and minimize risks to taxpayers.

By gaining a nuanced understanding of these enterprises, business leaders, investors, and policymakers can better anticipate market shifts, support informed decision-making, and help build a resilient and equitable housing finance ecosystem.

Frequently Ask Questions (FAQ)

What is the difference between Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac?

Fannie Mae primarily buys mortgages from larger commercial banks, while Freddie Mac buys mortgages from smaller banks, credit unions, and thrifts. Both entities securitize loans that meet the conforming loan limit and provide guarantees, but have slightly different underwriting guidelines and loan programs.

How do Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac support affordable housing?

They set affordable housing goals that specifically target low income families and purchase loans that meet criteria for low- and moderate-income borrowers, helping to increase access to mortgage credit for these groups. Their activities promote stability and affordability in the housing market. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are mandated to ensure their activities support affordable housing initiatives as part of their congressional charters.

What does conservatorship mean for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac?

Conservatorship is a form of government oversight initiated in 2008 to stabilize the GSEs during the financial crisis. As part of the financial recovery strategy during conservatorship, dividend payments to the government were required, supporting taxpayer protection and aiding in the stabilization process. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were placed under conservatorship in September 2008 to enhance their financial safety and soundness.

How do Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac affect mortgage interest rates?

By guaranteeing mortgage-backed securities and providing liquidity, they help lower the interest rate for borrowers. This reduces risk for lenders and investors, which generally leads to lower interest rates for borrowers compared to loans without such guarantees.

Are Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac government agencies?

No, they are government-sponsored enterprises—private companies with a congressional charter and implicit government backing but without an explicit government guarantee.

What risks are associated with the implicit government guarantee?

The implicit guarantee lowers borrowing costs by leading the market to assume government support for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, even though there is no explicit legal guarantee. While it lowers borrowing costs, it can encourage risk-taking behavior and create moral hazard, which regulators seek to mitigate through capital requirements and oversight.